What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
- Shingster
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 4140
- Joined: 08 Sep 2006, 11:14
Re: What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
Ninja is really terrible, one of the worst films I've seen so far this millennium!
- Markgway
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 20177
- Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04
Re: What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
It was on TV so I figured I'd give it a shot.
- Markgway
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 20177
- Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04
Re: What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
Dracula (1931-USA) *½
Pretty awful adaptation of Bram Stoker novel; poorly staged and woodenly acted (except for Dwight Frye who chews up all the scenery). Bela Lugosi's Count is iconic, but really, the poor man couldn't act for toffee. More likely to induce titters than chills.
Pretty awful adaptation of Bram Stoker novel; poorly staged and woodenly acted (except for Dwight Frye who chews up all the scenery). Bela Lugosi's Count is iconic, but really, the poor man couldn't act for toffee. More likely to induce titters than chills.
- Shingster
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 4140
- Joined: 08 Sep 2006, 11:14
Re: What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
I think that's an extremely unfair thing to say about Lugosi, the whole film is very stilted not just Lugosi, but hey that must have been what worked back then because without the success of Dracula there may never have been a Universal Horror era in the 30s. This wasn't his first turn as Dracula either, he played him throughout the late 20s on Broadway, again to great success. He was always hindered by his thick Hungarian accent, but watch him in The Black Cat and The Raven when his English was a little more fluent and say he couldn't act. He was also the best thing about Son of Frankenstein.
- Markgway
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 20177
- Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04
Re: What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
I've seen Lugosi in other films and never been impressed; it was his presence that made him memorable. Regardless, I may revisit them at some point. I'm working my way thru the Universal Monsters Box Set. Boris next.
- Markgway
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 20177
- Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04
Re: What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
The Survivors (1983-USA) *½
Offensively stupid comedy wastes Robin Williams (very annoying here) and Walter Matthau (funny when the material allows).
Offensively stupid comedy wastes Robin Williams (very annoying here) and Walter Matthau (funny when the material allows).
- Masterofoneinchpunch
- King of Beggars
- Posts: 863
- Joined: 10 Jan 2014, 19:36
Re: What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
In terms of direction, cinematography, getting performances out of actors -- James Whale is a much better director than Tod Browning, especially in the sound age. Now you will see a big difference in acting between Frankenstein and Bride of Frankenstein when Whale had more control over to hire like with the iconic performance of Ernest Thesiger.Markgway wrote:I've seen Lugosi in other films and never been impressed; it was his presence that made him memorable. Regardless, I may revisit them at some point. I'm working my way thru the Universal Monsters Box Set. Boris next.
To be fair to Lugosi, check out the Spanish version of Dracula which was filmed at night (typical of many films with two or more foreign-language versions.) The film is better directed than the Browning version, but compare the Dracula performances where you see the typical early 30s wooden performance (now I like Lupita Tovar's performance though.)
- Markgway
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 20177
- Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04
Re: What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
Frankenstein (1931-USA) ***
Universal's second monster horror is a significant step-up from Dracula.
Universal's second monster horror is a significant step-up from Dracula.
-
- Hail the Judge!
- Posts: 2352
- Joined: 16 Mar 2005, 23:05
Re: What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
I prefer Dracula even though Frankenstein is technically the better movie. Dracula has a more creepy atmosphere, and I'm very partial to the tail-end of the Jazz age setting.
Lugosi is a weird actor, as he can be very impressive, but teeters towards sending me into hysterics. He is probably my favourite horror actor, despite his flaws. Unlike Karloff or Lee, I don't think he ever gave a bored performance.
Lugosi is a weird actor, as he can be very impressive, but teeters towards sending me into hysterics. He is probably my favourite horror actor, despite his flaws. Unlike Karloff or Lee, I don't think he ever gave a bored performance.
bradavon wrote:
but I guess you're more intelligence than me.
but I guess you're more intelligence than me.
- Markgway
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 20177
- Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04
Re: What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
Karloff was massively a better actor than Lugosi, IMHO.
- Shingster
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 4140
- Joined: 08 Sep 2006, 11:14
Re: What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
Karloff was an undeniable great imo, Lugosi not so much but he did become a really great asset as a supporting actor for Universal (who exploited him terribly)
- Masterofoneinchpunch
- King of Beggars
- Posts: 863
- Joined: 10 Jan 2014, 19:36
Re: What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
I'm a huge Karloff fan and I think he is the better actor of the two. Now I like Bela Lugosi too but unfortunately the drug addiction he had started to wear him down later in his career where Karloff's health and back issues slowed him down as he got older -- but he still had the voice which he could effectively use. Lugosi could overact though his persona was certainly unique and influential. I tend to enjoy most of his performances even if they are stylized. Karloff certainly had more range. Both were typecast somewhat early unlike Vincent Price who really did not get typecast until The House of Wax (he certainly has some interesting film noir performances like Laura and even western ones like The Baron of Arizona.)
Now when they are together they could work a good movie such as with Robert Wise's The Body Snatcher with Val Lewton as producer.
Now when they are together they could work a good movie such as with Robert Wise's The Body Snatcher with Val Lewton as producer.
-
- Hail the Judge!
- Posts: 2352
- Joined: 16 Mar 2005, 23:05
Re: What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
Karloff is definetly superior in terms of range.
bradavon wrote:
but I guess you're more intelligence than me.
but I guess you're more intelligence than me.
- Markgway
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 20177
- Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04
Re: What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
The Mummy (*1932/3-USA) **½
*According to the imdb the film was released in the US on 22/12/32, yet the on screen copyright notice clearly states 1933. Someone is mistaken.
The Universal horrors are getting slicker now, everything is much smoother. Not a brilliant or scary film, but definitely interesting.
*According to the imdb the film was released in the US on 22/12/32, yet the on screen copyright notice clearly states 1933. Someone is mistaken.
The Universal horrors are getting slicker now, everything is much smoother. Not a brilliant or scary film, but definitely interesting.
-
- Hail the Judge!
- Posts: 2352
- Joined: 16 Mar 2005, 23:05
Re: What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
1932 release, and the print says 1933. I think there is a similar discrepancy on Casablanca.
bradavon wrote:
but I guess you're more intelligence than me.
but I guess you're more intelligence than me.
- Shingster
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 4140
- Joined: 08 Sep 2006, 11:14
Re: What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
From what I can gather I think it only played in one theatre (The Rialto in Washington) during the last week of 1932, then premiered on Broadway fist week of 1933, then the rest of L.A. two weeks after.
- Markgway
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 20177
- Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04
Re: What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
Ann Hui's A Simple Life has a similar story.
It played festivals in 2011, but the released film contains a 2012 copyright.
It's possible last minute tweaks were made (otherwise I see no reason to change the date).
It played festivals in 2011, but the released film contains a 2012 copyright.
It's possible last minute tweaks were made (otherwise I see no reason to change the date).
-
- Hail the Judge!
- Posts: 2352
- Joined: 16 Mar 2005, 23:05
Re: What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
One of Leslie Haliwell's odder reviews (he who disliked every movie after 1953) was for the 1940 The Mummy's Hand, where he claimed its last half hour was among the scariest ever. I can only assume he wrote than when he was 10.Markgway wrote:The Mummy (*1932/3-USA) **½
*According to the imdb the film was released in the US on 22/12/32, yet the on screen copyright notice clearly states 1933. Someone is mistaken.
The Universal horrors are getting slicker now, everything is much smoother. Not a brilliant or scary film, but definitely interesting.
bradavon wrote:
but I guess you're more intelligence than me.
but I guess you're more intelligence than me.
- Markgway
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 20177
- Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04
Re: What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
Haven't seen The Mummy's Hand.
The Invisible Man (1933-USA) **½
James Whale embraces the absurd in this blackly comic adaptation of H.G. Wells novel.
The monster this time is a true psychopath, killing babies and derailing trains for fun!
The Invisible Man (1933-USA) **½
James Whale embraces the absurd in this blackly comic adaptation of H.G. Wells novel.
The monster this time is a true psychopath, killing babies and derailing trains for fun!
- Markgway
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 20177
- Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04
Re: What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
Strange Brew (1983-Canada-USA) *
Really irritating, eh, totally unfunny, eh, comedy, eh.
I gave up after aboot an hour, eh....
Really irritating, eh, totally unfunny, eh, comedy, eh.
I gave up after aboot an hour, eh....
- grim_tales
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 22079
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
- Location: St. Albans, UK
Re: What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
There was a lot to enjoy in this film, Claude Rains was superb and the effects were amazing for the time, but the general shrieking and scenery chewing from (I assume) the stable of British character actors was painfulMarkgway wrote:Haven't seen The Mummy's Hand.
The Invisible Man (1933-USA) **½
James Whale embraces the absurd in this blackly comic adaptation of H.G. Wells novel.
The monster this time is a true psychopath, killing babies and derailing trains for fun!
-
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 9357
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 19:27
Re: What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
nothing wrong with the acting in this film,the screeching landlady, the PC Plod type copper etc added to the charm and fitted the film perfectly (imo)grim_tales wrote:There was a lot to enjoy in this film, Claude Rains was superb and the effects were amazing for the time, but the general shrieking and scenery chewing from (I assume) the stable of British character actors was painfulMarkgway wrote:Haven't seen The Mummy's Hand.
The Invisible Man (1933-USA) **½
James Whale embraces the absurd in this blackly comic adaptation of H.G. Wells novel.
The monster this time is a true psychopath, killing babies and derailing trains for fun!
working class blu-ray fan
- Markgway
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 20177
- Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04
Re: What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
The hysterical acting was an intentional part of the humour. I was surprised at just how comic the film was. I guess after Dracula, et al, I was expecting something more serious. I did forget to mention how impressive the special effects were.
-
- Hail the Judge!
- Posts: 2352
- Joined: 16 Mar 2005, 23:05
Re: What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
Is this your first time seeing the Universal monster classics, Mark?
bradavon wrote:
but I guess you're more intelligence than me.
but I guess you're more intelligence than me.
- Markgway
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 20177
- Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04
Re: What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
First time since childhood. I grew out of monster movies. Now I'm revisiting them as an adult.
The Bride of Frankenstein (1935-USA) ***
Uneven, but unforgettable sequel. Some elements I liked better than in the original -- the blind hermit gave the film a new depth, the tragedy of the monster, but the titular character isn't shown until the end, and since she never returned in any sequel, it feels a bit like a missed opportunity... also the shrieking humour should've stayed in The Invisible Man where it belonged. Karloff is great, naturally, so's Elsa Lanchester (for the little screen time she has).
The Bride of Frankenstein (1935-USA) ***
Uneven, but unforgettable sequel. Some elements I liked better than in the original -- the blind hermit gave the film a new depth, the tragedy of the monster, but the titular character isn't shown until the end, and since she never returned in any sequel, it feels a bit like a missed opportunity... also the shrieking humour should've stayed in The Invisible Man where it belonged. Karloff is great, naturally, so's Elsa Lanchester (for the little screen time she has).