What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5
-
bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
No particular martial arts film and no not generalising.
I was just making a general comment, that's all. I don't even know how you could come to the conclusion "I was generalising on the whole genre" based on what I said. I tend to find a 90-100 minute martial arts film (or action film) with only 10 minutes of decent martial arts in an otherwise dull film, for example, won't mean it's overall a good film.
Jeez, what is it with members reading too much into my comments, thinking I'm generalising on everything
I was just making a general comment, that's all. I don't even know how you could come to the conclusion "I was generalising on the whole genre" based on what I said. I tend to find a 90-100 minute martial arts film (or action film) with only 10 minutes of decent martial arts in an otherwise dull film, for example, won't mean it's overall a good film.
Jeez, what is it with members reading too much into my comments, thinking I'm generalising on everything
-
saltysam
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 9357
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 19:27
P2 2/5
Ok thriller featuring Rachel Nichols who on xmas eve gets locked in an underground car park with psycho security guard Wes Bentley.certainly watchable this suffers from a particularly weak villain turn from Wes Bentley who just doesn't scare. Nice early ludicrous plot device gets Big-titted Nichols showing nice cleavage for most of the film though
Ok thriller featuring Rachel Nichols who on xmas eve gets locked in an underground car park with psycho security guard Wes Bentley.certainly watchable this suffers from a particularly weak villain turn from Wes Bentley who just doesn't scare. Nice early ludicrous plot device gets Big-titted Nichols showing nice cleavage for most of the film though
- grim_tales
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 22163
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
- Location: St. Albans, UK
Sex and the Silver Screen: 3.5/5
Interesting documentary on the history of censorship and portrayal of sex within American cinema. I've only seen the 1st 2 parts so far.
It's good but not in the same league as the terrific documentary on MGM - 'When The Lion Roars' what lets it down is the overly scripted, patchy narration by Raquel Welch, and the lack of any real interview footage with the participants/people. It feels strange hearing an actor read out another person's words, as was the case throughout this piece whenever a quotation was needed.
There are some interesting clips though.
Interesting documentary on the history of censorship and portrayal of sex within American cinema. I've only seen the 1st 2 parts so far.
It's good but not in the same league as the terrific documentary on MGM - 'When The Lion Roars' what lets it down is the overly scripted, patchy narration by Raquel Welch, and the lack of any real interview footage with the participants/people. It feels strange hearing an actor read out another person's words, as was the case throughout this piece whenever a quotation was needed.
There are some interesting clips though.
Last edited by grim_tales on 16 Apr 2008, 15:24, edited 1 time in total.
-
EvaUnit02
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 9150
- Joined: 08 Feb 2005, 14:39
- Location: Wellywood, Kiwiland
- Contact:
-
saltysam
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 9357
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 19:27
-
saltysam
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 9357
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 19:27
no,explain it to me please.here's a quote from you regarding Waterworld-"Waterworld: Theatrical Cut is okay but it's also mostly awful" how can an awful film be ok?bradavon wrote:You don't know the difference between good and fairly good?
- HungFist
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 11924
- Joined: 14 Dec 2005, 15:50
- Location: Japan
- Contact:
-
bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
Yes we are going in circles and I don't think it really matters, but seeing as you must know
-
* Mostly awful means it's not outright awful as it has moments which are okay. Clear? As in "Mostly Awful".
* Hung is pretty much right but I'd say 1 out of 5 or 1.5 out of 5 is awful, not mostly awful. Confused?
* Mostly awful means it's not outright awful as it has moments which are okay. Clear? As in "Mostly Awful".
* Hung is pretty much right but I'd say 1 out of 5 or 1.5 out of 5 is awful, not mostly awful. Confused?