Bullets 'n' Babes

Fatal Move is unwatchable beyond words, anyone who likes that is fucking mental in the head. CGI fucking shit and appalling plot, cast and acting. The worst film I have seen this year.

romerojpg wrote:Fatal Move is unwatchable beyond words, anyone who likes that is fucking mental in the head. CGI fucking shit and appalling plot, cast and acting. The worst film I have seen this year.

But SPL wasn't any better than it apparently

luckystars wrote:But SPL wasn't any better than it apparently

Just because I give two films the same star rating doesn't mean they're comparable in quality. There are many factors I take into account when in assigning stars.

I'm not gonna start taking lessons in film criticism from Luckystars who doesn't even know how to properly rate a movie.

SPL is countless times the film Fatal Move CGI turd is.

Markgway wrote:

luckystars wrote:But SPL wasn't any better than it apparently

Just because I give two films the same star rating doesn't mean they're comparable in quality. There are many factors I take into account when in assigning stars.

I'm not gonna start taking lessons in film criticism from Luckystars who doesn't even know how to properly rate a movie.

Wow we're back to that.

I give all the films with Airoplanes in ****'s

Just write 4 out of 5 not crapovision tiny stars which people can barely even see.

romerojpg wrote:Just write 4 out of 5 not crapovision tiny stars which people can barely even see.

I don't do ratings that way and I'm not gonna change my system just so a pair of tits can understand it.

Well you keep on mixing your little tiny stars that barley anyone can see, and then plonking a .5 on the end anyway for half marks

romerojpg wrote:Well you keep on mixing your little tiny stars that barley anyone can see, and then plonking a .5 on the end anyway for half marks

I use .5 because I figured that was easier for you guys to follow than 1/2.

I do try to take the board's simpletons into account.

You also must have your font size gigantic, or you have your resolution so low its easy to see a bunch of stars so small

Yes, it's MY fault for being able to see *****

nah your resolution must be 800x600 to see them that close together

They are literally 2mm high on my screen (and I have a big screen) and pretty much impossible to see space between them without wasting time looking closer, when a number is far far easier to see and no double glancing needed.

Tell me where to find the resolution and I'll check for you.

I am semi joking, but they are tin for me
Not sure which Windows you are on, but - Control panel - Appearance and Personalization - Adjust screen resolution (dont adjust, just look)

1600x900

Pretty damn high so forget everything I said

Personally I find marks out of 4 and stars instead of numbers slightly pretentious, marks out of 5 or 10 works perfectly well and can be immediately understood by newcomers without a disclaimer that the scoring system is slightly different, but I believe whoever writes the review/comments has the right to choose their own rating system, so I'm not sure why people keep moaning about them!

Shingster wrote:Personally I find marks out of 4 and stars instead of numbers slightly pretentious, marks out of 5 or 10 works perfectly well and can be immediately understood by newcomers without a disclaimer that the scoring system is slightly different

Agreed. Newbies would immediately assume it's a rating out of 5. Mark cannot even be bothered to put ***.5 out of 4.

It's also double pretentious using stars. What's wrong with 3.5/4? It's immediately clear what you mean and Mark can strill use his anally retentive rating system.

Shingster wrote:but I believe whoever writes the review/comments has the right to choose their own rating system, so I'm not sure why people keep moaning about them!

Because it's pretentious and being difficult for difficult's sake. Everyone else is perfectly happy with a rating out of 5 or 10 but Mark considers himself to important to use a rating system everyone else uses.

bradavon wrote:Everyone else is perfectly happy with a rating out of 5 or 10 but Mark considers himself to important to use a rating system everyone else uses.

Actually I think Mark is just someone who prefers a different scoring system, that is all.

I'm not being pretentious. It's just how I like to rate films.

You guys are free to mark out of 5 or 10 if you so wish.

And you all know I mark out of 4 now so hardly work explaining each time.

Okay, one final questions. What's with the stars? I actually find them much more annoying than the score .

Yeah and technically they're asterisks

bradavon wrote:Okay, one final questions. What's with the stars? I actually find them much more annoying than the score .

Because he's a 'real' critic like Mark Commode

gasteropod wrote:Yeah and technically they're asterisks

Zucchini or courgette. Give a fuck.

luckystars wrote:Because he's a 'real' critic like Mark Commode

Who's that? Technically it's Mark Kermode.

He talks loads of shit but is funny when he says it. If that was a dig at me. I've not listened to him in months. His podcast is way too long.

bradavon wrote:

gasteropod wrote:Yeah and technically they're asterisks

Zucchini or courgette. Give a fuck.

I actually meant I agree with you and that they're not even stars, they're asterisks so that's why they're annoying. Nothing wrong with nice big stars for reviews, but asterisks are too small.