Bullets 'n' Babes

Sam was being sarcastic.

I'm not liking this. Shifting aspect ratios are very annoying & tend to take me out of the film.

Plus, how many people are going to think their BD is faulty & take it back for a replacement? I don't think this is a good idea at all.

Jeez Louis guys, at least wait until you've actually seen it before dismissing it.

If its Nolan's idea, I'll see it before judging

the film might be pants and no-one here might want the blu-ray anyway

grim_tales wrote:My Odeon say if you go to a special preview screening (on 23 July I think) you get some sort of limited poster

And you only have to pay almost double the normal ticket price for the pleasure of getting that limited poster!

True. I virtually go for those rip off deals.

Shingster wrote:

grim_tales wrote:My Odeon say if you go to a special preview screening (on 23 July I think) you get some sort of limited poster

And you only have to pay almost double the normal ticket price for the pleasure of getting that limited poster!

Really? Didnt realise that Shing, old bean
I'm not going at 12:00am and paying £11 or something just for some limited poster

You say that, but we know you better.

Batman Forever's on Film4 and I never realised how terrible it was when I was a kid lol, it was like my favourite one back then.

romerojpg wrote:You say that, but we know you better.

The Dark Knight is currently #1 greatest film ever made on IMDb hahaha. I reckon I'm off to see this on Wednesday, can't wait

Yup shows you how sad the IMDB is haha when a load of them voted before the film was even out it must make them feel good voting for a film before they see it, sad fools. Guess it beast them voting for the next Uwe boll film before its even finished.

Romero I think I know myself better than you do

Get your hands out of your pants boy! see I do know you.

romerojpg wrote:Yup shows you how sad the IMDB is haha when a load of them voted before the film was even out

Votes only came through once it had been released in Australia.

Off topic this, but why is The Godfather ranked above Shawshank when they both have the same score (9.2/10), yet Shawshank has recieved far more votes? Are they ranking these films through scores with more than 1 decimal place or something?

gasteropod wrote:

romerojpg wrote:Yup shows you how sad the IMDB is haha when a load of them voted before the film was even out

Votes only came through once it had been released in Australia.

Its not as simple as that, once a screening of the film has been done people can vote sometimes, even if the film was not even finished. The whole voting system is pants, the latest Uwe Boll films for instance may not be finished, but it can have 10000 votes all 0 out of 10 haha

Put it this way if a film is screened somewhere like a preview in australia with 1000 people in the audience only in ome cinema, and IMDB then gets 20000 votes the next day, its obvious most people are bull artists

and honestly anyone care about such numbers? as Godfather is pants for starters, Shawshank os good, but not exactly a film I would bother with again once you know the twist.

grim_tales wrote:Romero I think I know myself better than you do

No you're wrong, Romero knows us all better than we know ourselves .

He keeps thinking he knows me better than I do anyway.

I do, its obvious to many when you talk about you, your life, your friends, family, personal situation, job, loves and hates and everything in between etc.. etc...

Hence why I rarley talk private stuff, family, friends or anything personal at all. The few nuggets of shite I do let out, I try not to expand on and ussually I let out by accident.

I just stick to slagging off scum, thieves, criminals and loving or hating films in equal measure

I never get how people can open their personal lives to complete strangers on a forum, and then when something goes wrong and someone slags them off and has an argument, they have ammo to really upset them by brining in the family etc... fuels the fire on some forums.

Maybe not about Batman, but hell not many her have even seen Batty yet.

romerojpg wrote:I do, its obvious to many when you talk about you, your life, your friends, family, personal situation, job, loves and hates and everything in between etc.. etc...

Right. So you know me better than I do, based on what I give away online. Okay, that makes sense.

romerojpg wrote:Hence why I rarley talk private stuff, family, friends or anything personal at all. The few nuggets of shite I do let out, I try not to expand on and ussually I let out by accident.

Well bully for you.

God the world would be a better place, if we were all like you .

romerojpg wrote:I never get how people can open their personal lives to complete strangers on a forum.

Sorry. I won't ever, ever, ever do it again.

and you wonder why some people hate your guts as you really have no idea how to read anyones posts at all, or respond to them without being a bit of a dick.

romerojpg wrote:and you wonder why some people hate your guts

I don't wonder at all. I've got better things to be doing. You're the one who keeps bringing it up.

bradavon wrote: I don't wonder at all. I've got better things to be doing.

Are you sure? for someone who doesn't care,after all it's the "internet" and also claims to barely have time to watch his dvds you seem to have the free time to be on here than anyone

What does that have to do with wondering why Romero thinks some people hate my guts?