The General DVD/HD Disc Bargains Thread!

EvaUnit02 · Post by **EvaUnit02** » 11 Jun 2006, 06:26

romerojpg wrote:That is ineed the one I am suing,

So why have you slapped them with a law suit?

IronMonkey · Post by **IronMonkey** » 11 Jun 2006, 11:01

bradavon wrote:I usually proof read most posts I type and edit them if they're wrong; I know most don't bother.

LOL, then you should learn the difference between "to" and "too"!

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 11 Jun 2006, 12:45

I have thanks. Where are you quoting me from as I've not even used to, too or any other variation?

If you really want me to be nitpicky too I could pick up on stacks of errors people make (and definitely visa-versa) but I'm not going to for reasons I've already mentioned.

romerojpg wrote:I convert them to 90kbps as its a commentary and you do not need good quality at all

Thanks but I asked what the average file size was?

Agreed 96Kbps would be fine for just speech.

romerojpg wrote:That is ineed the one I am suing, the one I used to use was better and quicker, but when my PC was wiped I cannot find out what I used to use sadly

You can't remember what it was called? That WinAVI software you recommended to me is is really useful, thanks. It's a thousand times quicker than TMPGENC (which is much better overall though).

IronMonkey · Post by **IronMonkey** » 11 Jun 2006, 13:00

bradavon wrote:I have thanks.

No you haven't!

bradavon wrote:Where are you quoting me from as I've not even used to, too or any other variation?

Exactly! You've never used "too" before your last post, even when you should have! Look at just about every other post you've ever made. You always say things like "That costs to much at the moment" when you should use "too".

Honestly, you're wrong when it comes to correct usage of "to" and "too". Look them up, and take a look at your previous posts.

A lot of people spell things like that wrongly and it infuriates me! :twisted: LOL!

Other people on these boards (I think EvaUnit02 and someone else) get "then" and "than" confused all the time. They write sentences like "That one's better then the other". It's "than", not "then" damnit!

The other big one is where people say "I could care less" when they actually mean they couldn't care less. Bah, all of you need to go back to school!

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 11 Jun 2006, 13:08

I wouldn't correct people's English IM as one day you'll make a mistake and people will really notice + you make stacks of mistakes anyway (we all do, it's the nature of forums).

Brad makes a point to spot when IM makes a mistake.

You always say things like "That costs to much at the moment" when you should use "too"

Good spot consider me corrected. You will find I use too as in "I came along too" though, unless like I said I make a mistake.

Feel free to correct me in future but make sure you get it right

. Mark has corrected me before and got it all wrong. I consider my English to be better than average, average being Romero

You've never used "too" before your last post, even when you should have!

That's not an easy job when I've not used either word at all on this page. Personally it pisses me off when people drop I from a sentence as in:

Have been to the car.

romerojpg · Post by **romerojpg** » 11 Jun 2006, 13:10

They work about about 50+ MB file sizes for an average film

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 11 Jun 2006, 13:13

Thanks. That's a reasonable size.

gasteropod · Post by **gasteropod** » 11 Jun 2006, 23:35

bradavon wrote: If you really want me to be nitpicky too I could pick up on stacks of errors people make (and definitely visa-versa)

You mean vice versa

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 11 Jun 2006, 23:48

brooce-leroy · Post by **brooce-leroy** » 12 Jun 2006, 23:04

slasher13 wrote:I just watched UnderWorld Evolution and really liked it.

I loved the first one, and have the EIV version, which is very good. Its a straight port of the R1 version, and they haven't messed up on the cover. The cover is the same as well

The R1 Columbia Tristar Underworld Ext. version is much better packaging-wise:

brooce-leroy · Post by **brooce-leroy** » 12 Jun 2006, 23:05

bradavon wrote:

brad, what's with the new hairdo, and blimey you've put on weight!

EvaUnit02 · Post by **EvaUnit02** » 13 Jun 2006, 00:28

brooce-leroy wrote:The R1 Columbia Tristar Underworld Ext. version is much better packaging-wise:

The DTS track on the EIV Extended release makes your argument of buying the R1 for the better packaging moot.

brooce-leroy · Post by **brooce-leroy** » 13 Jun 2006, 00:44

No it doesn't, as some people like sexy packaging, and DTS isn't everything. 8) EIV version doesn't have a comic either.

The 5.1 on the R1 is shit hot. It doesn't matter as I've sold the dvd now anyway.

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 13 Jun 2006, 13:53

bradavon wrote:Mark has corrected me before and got it all wrong.

Now come on, Brad. There's no way your grammer is better than mine.

Yi-Long · Post by **Yi-Long** » 13 Jun 2006, 16:13

Markgway wrote:
bradavon wrote:Mark has corrected me before and got it all wrong.
Now come on, Brad. There's no way your grammer is better than mine.

*ahum* GrammAr *ahum*

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 13 Jun 2006, 18:51

Well-spotted, Yi Long. It was for Brad, but never mind.

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 13 Jun 2006, 18:56

EvaUnit02 wrote:The DTS track on the EIV Extended release makes your argument of buying the R1 for the better packaging moot.

More than moot it makes it pointless. Besides Slasher was talking about Underworld Evolution NOT Underworld (so all that trouble to upload the photo was worthless

)

brooce-leroy wrote:EIV version doesn't have a comic either. The 5.1 on the R1 is shit hot. It doesn't matter as I've sold the dvd now anyway.

The R1 has a comic, huh? Of what?

romerojpg · Post by **romerojpg** » 13 Jun 2006, 19:03

Comics got Porno with KATE GETTING DOWN AND NASTY

The DTS is overated anyway, barley (if any) difference. But the packaging is georgous, if simple.

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 13 Jun 2006, 23:43

romerojpg wrote:Comics got Porno with KATE GETTING DOWN AND NASTY

Seriously what's the comic about?

The DTS is overated anyway, barley (if any) difference. But the packaging is georgous, if simple.

I thought you owned the R1? I'd prefer DTS than not at all so I can hear for myself.

brooce-leroy · Post by **brooce-leroy** » 14 Jun 2006, 00:51

bradavon wrote: (so all that trouble to upload the photo was worthless )

Nah, it only took me about 5 minutes as I already had the picture saved from when I sold the dvd.

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 14 Jun 2006, 19:38

It took you five minutes to upload a photo you already had on your hard disk???

brooce-leroy · Post by **brooce-leroy** » 14 Jun 2006, 22:09

It was on my camera.

slasher13 · Post by **slasher13** » 15 Jun 2006, 15:27

LOL, this is what I said

I just watched UnderWorld Evolution and really liked it. I loved the first one, and have the EIV version, which is very good. Its a straight port of the R1 version, and they haven't messed up on the cover. The cover is the same as well. I can't wait for the extended cut, hopefully soon it will come out.... Methink later in Oct/Dec time.

So was talking about both movies, yes I did have the r1, but I think I sold it to someone, I think it may be bruce or someone

. Then wanted to watch the movie again, so got the r2 version which was only a fiver

I will get UnderWorld Evolution, when the extended cut/director cut comes out as I really liked the movie

saltysam · Post by **saltysam** » 21 Jun 2006, 20:30

kiss kiss bang bang £4.89 delivered amazon jersey

http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/tg/ ... 82-4427820

EvaUnit02 · Post by **EvaUnit02** » 21 Jun 2006, 23:40

saltysam wrote:kiss kiss bang bang £4.89 delivered amazon jersey

Waste of time. It's missing the extras from the R1, most notably the commentary.