Bullets 'n' Babes

She still doing nude modelling?

Who the eff did Kelly's makeup in that Playboy shot?

They've taken an attractive woman and made her look like a heroin-addicted slapper.

grim_tales wrote:She still doing nude modelling?

And going naked in films... Three features a lot of naked Kelly, and Piranha is supposed to too. I might have to go see that today...

degeneration wrote:But they now look like this: [url=http://www.sideburns.co.uk/forum/upload ... 294066.jpg]Click[/url

Surely that must be fake? They're definitely much bigger than that.

grim_tales wrote:She still doing nude modelling?

She'll be in Playboy later this year.

Markgway wrote:They've taken an attractive woman and made her look like a heroin-addicted slapper.

Agreed. She looks awful.

I'd still ram her all day & all night.

saltysam wrote:I'd still ram her all day & all night.

+1

That pic is from the Playboy shoot.

bradavon wrote:

degeneration wrote:But they now look like this: [url=http://www.sideburns.co.uk/forum/upload ... 294066.jpg]Click[/url

Surely that must be fake? They're definitely much bigger than that.

Well unless the pics have been modified and I don't know why they'd photoshop them to make her breasts smaller, those are the current actual size (or current for when that shoot was done).

bradavon wrote:She'll be in Playboy later this year.

She'll be in playboy now. That pic and some other similar ones to it are in Sept's issue. Or see them on sideburns...

I got all excited when I heard she'd be in Playboy but they're most disappointing. Firstly, she's not fully nude. This is Playboy! Secondly WTF her boobs have shrunk and thirdly she's wearing way too much make up. I hate it when girls wear a ridiculous amount of make up, it literally looks worse than no make up. The pics:

http://www.sideburns.co.uk/forum/index. ... topic=2289

saltysam wrote:I'd still ram her all day & all night.

Obviously, that goes without saying. She still a stunning woman.

Disappointing shoot. Kelly looks better in paparazzi snapshots(!)
How can this Playboy photographer call themselves a professional?

Markgway wrote:Disappointing shoot. Kelly looks better in paparazzi snapshots(!)

Definitely. She looks unnatural. Of course I wasn't expecting no photoshop touching up but not this. It doesn't even really look like her.

She looked amazing in an Arena magazine shoot a few years ago. That was a much better pictorial.

http://www.egotastic.com/entertainment/ ... ite-005623

Remember Roxanne Pallett?
She was the really cute girl I mentioned having as my desktop wallpaper on my old PC?
Was in Emmerdale and on Dancing on Ice...

Well, here she is sans clothes in a sexy scene from some Cable TV trash called Lake Placid 3:
http://vodpod.com/watch/4645343-foxy-ro ... in-the-nip

I'm saving you from having to watch the whole thing.
Thank me.

She's really hot but talk about your career doing down the plug hole. Is that the best work she could find? That's not a topless short but completely nude for ages. I think I'll watch it again, just to make sure it's her.

Kelly Brook looks incredible in that dress too, in Bruce's link above.

Nice boobies.

bradavon wrote:I think I'll watch it again, just to make sure it's her.

Erm... It's her.

bradavon wrote:She's really hot but talk about your career doing down the plug hole. Is that the best work she could find?

Barring a miracle her career as a "proper" actress is over.
She will from now on be the goto girl for nudity and screaming in budget horror movies.
I'm not complaining because she's fit as fuck...
But it does seem strange to go from mildly sensual soapstar to full frontal shagging.
She's never appeared nude before - not even topless in print.
And now suddenly full monty... and in a load of trash that about 100 people will have watched (the viewing figures for most American TV are marginal compared to the UK).
Go figure.

I think I'll watch it again, just to make sure it's her.

Best. Excuse. Ever.

IronMonkey wrote:Erm... It's her.

Yeah I know

Markgway wrote:Best. Excuse. Ever.

I had to be sure

Markgway wrote:But it does seem strange to go from mildly sensual soapstar to full frontal shagging.

It's hard to believe but this is a step down from Emmerdale. She must be really desperate to break into American TV/Films but surely it's obvious this won't help. I guess technically it is exposure, literally.

Markgway wrote:And now suddenly full monty... and in a load of trash that about 100 people will have watched (the viewing figures for most American TV are marginal compared to the UK).

True. American TV is a lot more segregated. Despite having a lot of choice nowadays, it's still the top 5 that are by far the most popular.

bradavon wrote:It's hard to believe but this is a step down from Emmerdale.

True. Emmerdale gets millions of viewers every single day.
I doubt 25,000 saw Lake Placid 3 when it premiered on cable.

She must be really desperate to break into American TV/Films but surely it's obvious this won't help. I guess technically it is exposure, literally.

There is such a thing as the wrong kind of exposure. At least Kelly Brook chose a cinema film like Piranha 3D that actually got fairly good reviews.

Kelly Brook looking totally hot and fully nude:

http://www.sideburns.co.uk/forum/index. ... topic=2520

Forgot those rubbish Playboy shots, these are much better.

Or just watch Piranha 3D and see it all in long lingering shots

Actual fanny shots.

Yeah, actually fanny shots, but she looks AWFUL. Was just about to post the same link on here with a comment on how the pictures are a complete turn off and other than for curiosity, they should be ignored.

degeneration wrote:Yeah, actually fanny shots, but she looks AWFUL. Was just about to post the same link on here with a comment on how the pictures are a complete turn off and other than for curiosity, they should be ignored.

Sadly true. I don't 'get' all this weird paint stuff. Too 'arty' for me. I prefer plain old nudie shots.

The chick looks like she's got a skin-disease...

Not hot.

Also, Mark, I don't know this for sure, but I've read somewhere that if you know where to look on the world wide web, you can actually find quite a lot of fanny-shots!

Yi-Long wrote:Also, Mark, I don't know this for sure, but I've read somewhere that if you know where to look on the world wide web, you can actually find quite a lot of fanny-shots!

Of Kelly Brook?