Posted: 29 Sep 2006, 09:28
The MTV Jack Black parody of Spiderman did something similar.
The MTV Jack Black parody of Spiderman did something similar.
Bullets 'n' Babes
https://www.bulletsnbabesdvd.com/forums/
Spiderman 3 News/Rumors (new casting announced)
https://www.bulletsnbabesdvd.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1382
Page 4 of 5
The MTV Jack Black parody of Spiderman did something similar.
Posted: 10 Nov 2006, 10:51
Posted: 10 Nov 2006, 11:18
Looks pretty crap, TBH. I hate the black suit (loved it in the comics), still dont care for skanky white girl as MJ Watson, some of the CGI of blacksuit spidey looks shite, it semes they turned Sandman into Uncle Ben's killer (WTF?), etc etc.
Posted: 10 Nov 2006, 12:49
You can tell all that from a trailer? 
True Sandman = Uncle Ben's kiler is a bit of a WTF moment, I thought he was just a random robber - still looks exciting though
True Sandman = Uncle Ben's kiler is a bit of a WTF moment, I thought he was just a random robber - still looks exciting though
Posted: 14 Nov 2006, 02:23
Looks promising, but the CGI still looks very cartoony. I'd like to see some footage of Venom in action.
Retconning obviously. It is a comic book movie afterall. There's some production stills floating around with the spikey-haired bleached blonde guy (the random robber) from Spidey 1 and pre-mutation Sandman standing together floating around the net; try looking on Superherohype if you're interested (minor spoilers obviously, but there's nothing really spoil if you don't know the context/story of the scenes from which the stills are taken).it semes they turned Sandman into Uncle Ben's killer (WTF?)
Posted: 26 Nov 2006, 00:06
OK, Venom is gonna be in this film:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSWQWFO64zI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSWQWFO64zI
Posted: 10 Jan 2007, 12:45
Posted: 10 Jan 2007, 12:54
But no Venom footage is in there, unlike LostDragon
Posted: 10 Jan 2007, 12:57
The trailer is cool though
I'll get the Spidey cartoon set at some point (the 90's one).
I'll get the Spidey cartoon set at some point (the 90's one).
Posted: 18 Apr 2007, 18:41
Spider-Man 3 a 12A:
SPIDER-MAN 3
Feature
Film
Classified 17 April, 2007 .
Run Time 138m 59s
Expected to open on 04/05/2007
Advice for consumers
Concise Contains strong fantasy violence
The main spoken language in this work is English.
The BBFC has placed this work in the ACTION, FANTASY, SCIENCE FICTION genre(s).
When submitted to the BBFC the work had a running time of 138m 59s.
The running time of this film was calculated from the measured length of 12508+7 ( feet + frames ).
This work was passed with no cuts made.
At the time of classification Sony Pictures Releasing was the distributor of this film.
Directed by Sam Raimi Producer(s) Avi Arad; Grant Curtis; Laura Ziskin
The cast for this work includes: Tobey Maguire, Kirsten Dunst, James Franco, Thomas Haden Church, Topher Grace, Bryce Dallas Howard, Theresa Russell, Bill Nunn.
A film or video, together with associated trailers may exist in several versions and all versions known to the BBFC are listed below.
SPIDER-MAN 3
Feature
Film
Classified 17 April, 2007 .
Run Time 138m 59s
Expected to open on 04/05/2007
Advice for consumers
Concise Contains strong fantasy violence
The main spoken language in this work is English.
The BBFC has placed this work in the ACTION, FANTASY, SCIENCE FICTION genre(s).
When submitted to the BBFC the work had a running time of 138m 59s.
The running time of this film was calculated from the measured length of 12508+7 ( feet + frames ).
This work was passed with no cuts made.
At the time of classification Sony Pictures Releasing was the distributor of this film.
Directed by Sam Raimi Producer(s) Avi Arad; Grant Curtis; Laura Ziskin
The cast for this work includes: Tobey Maguire, Kirsten Dunst, James Franco, Thomas Haden Church, Topher Grace, Bryce Dallas Howard, Theresa Russell, Bill Nunn.
A film or video, together with associated trailers may exist in several versions and all versions known to the BBFC are listed below.
Posted: 18 Apr 2007, 19:35
Good, good.
Posted: 03 May 2007, 21:05
You guys aren't gonna believe this but I got tickets for this tomorrow... on a digital screen! I'm gonna be the first person in Aberdeen (and probably this forum) to visit a digital screen I reckon. 
Posted: 03 May 2007, 21:40
Pfft, digital. We have an IMAX screen in my town.BiscLimpkit wrote:You guys aren't gonna believe this but I got tickets for this tomorrow... on a digital screen! I'm gonna be the first person in Aberdeen (and probably this forum) to visit a digital screen I reckon.
Posted: 03 May 2007, 22:36
I'll do you guys one better: I'm looking at a digital screen as we speak!
Anyway, back to Spidey 3. I've read a few reviews now that say the 3rd movie isnt as good as the first two, and that they feel there's too much in the movie and it seems very rushed in the 3rd part of the movie to tie it all up.
So my guess is that there has been more then a few cuts made to get this movie in under a certain number of minutes, and we will quite possibly see a longer, uncut version which might gel a bit better then the theatrical release. So I will probably just wait for the DVD-release, instead of seeing it in the theatre.
Anyway, back to Spidey 3. I've read a few reviews now that say the 3rd movie isnt as good as the first two, and that they feel there's too much in the movie and it seems very rushed in the 3rd part of the movie to tie it all up.
So my guess is that there has been more then a few cuts made to get this movie in under a certain number of minutes, and we will quite possibly see a longer, uncut version which might gel a bit better then the theatrical release. So I will probably just wait for the DVD-release, instead of seeing it in the theatre.
Posted: 03 May 2007, 22:46
Lame attempt at a witty response, you and your monitor fail. Also you're Dutch so that failure is automatically multiplied by over 9000.Yi-Long wrote:I'll do you guys one better: I'm looking at a digital screen as we speak!
Posted: 03 May 2007, 23:20
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBtpyeLxVkIEvaUnit02 wrote:Lame attempt at a witty response, you and your monitor fail. Also you're Dutch so that failure is automatically multiplied by over 9000.Yi-Long wrote:I'll do you guys one better: I'm looking at a digital screen as we speak!
At least in Holland we dont have to shag sheep, like you ugly hobbits have to resort to...
Posted: 04 May 2007, 00:01
Haha
Posted: 04 May 2007, 05:38
Look whose talking, Holland is the world's biggest producer of beastiality porn. You fail, donkey show boy.Yi-Long wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBtpyeLxVkIEvaUnit02 wrote:Lame attempt at a witty response, you and your monitor fail. Also you're Dutch so that failure is automatically multiplied by over 9000.Yi-Long wrote:I'll do you guys one better: I'm looking at a digital screen as we speak!
At least in Holland we dont have to shag sheep, like you ugly hobbits have to resort to...
Posted: 04 May 2007, 08:36
What's with all this "you fail" malarky? I'm getting a bit sick of it to be honest. It seems you're just here to dig at everyone at the moment EvaUnit02.
Posted: 04 May 2007, 10:01
It's cool and hip Internet lingo, dontcha know. Makes people who use it instantly superior to everyone else simply by virtue of using it.
Posted: 04 May 2007, 10:25
The only reason why 'we' keep producing bestiality porn is because we know you guys keep buying it, and your own animals keep turning your ugly asses down...EvaUnit02 wrote:Look whose talking, Holland is the world's biggest producer of beastiality porn. You fail, donkey show boy.Yi-Long wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBtpyeLxVkIEvaUnit02 wrote:Lame attempt at a witty response, you and your monitor fail. Also you're Dutch so that failure is automatically multiplied by over 9000.Yi-Long wrote:I'll do you guys one better: I'm looking at a digital screen as we speak!
At least in Holland we dont have to shag sheep, like you ugly hobbits have to resort to...
Posted: 04 May 2007, 11:33
Interesting... I've read a few reviews that say its a good, fun action film etc, but its too long as it is and sags in the middle. I'm sure I'll enjoy it though.Yi-Long wrote:I'll do you guys one better: I'm looking at a digital screen as we speak!
Anyway, back to Spidey 3. I've read a few reviews now that say the 3rd movie isnt as good as the first two, and that they feel there's too much in the movie and it seems very rushed in the 3rd part of the movie to tie it all up.
So my guess is that there has been more then a few cuts made to get this movie in under a certain number of minutes, and we will quite possibly see a longer, uncut version which might gel a bit better then the theatrical release. So I will probably just wait for the DVD-release, instead of seeing it in the theatre.
Posted: 04 May 2007, 17:35
Yi-Long wrote: At least in Holland we dont have to shag sheep, like you ugly hobbits have to resort to...
Hey I found a picture of Eva here.
Anyway back on topic - I've not seen a trailer or anything. So no spoilers for me. Cannot wait.
Posted: 05 May 2007, 09:40
Spider-man 3 3.5/5
No way near as good as the first two but still fun.
Watching it on the digital screen 5/5
The first thing you notice is that the BBFC certificate is perfectly still. No wobble, maximum clarity. Superb.
No way near as good as the first two but still fun.
Watching it on the digital screen 5/5
The first thing you notice is that the BBFC certificate is perfectly still. No wobble, maximum clarity. Superb.
Posted: 08 May 2007, 07:57
What first bloke watching a digital screen?! Digital cinemas are "old" news and have been around here (up on the fringes of your so called civilization) for years... I don't go very often (because cinemas is blood awful and the quality barely better than my HT) but I caught at least SWEP3 and Cars projected digitally... and they aren't exactly new.