Page 1 of 2
Christopher Nolan's new film, The Prestige
Posted: 02 Jun 2006, 16:56
by EvaUnit02
This sounds promising. Great cast and director too.
Nolan Conjures The Prestige
Director Christopher Nolan (Batman Begins) told SCI FI Wire that he's well into development on his next project, a supernatural period movie called The Prestige. "It's a film about two magicians in turn-of-the-century London," Nolan said in an interview at the Saturn Awards in Universal City, Calif., on May 2. "And they enter into a deadly rivalry. And it's the story of how the two of them essentially try and sabotage each other's careers over the years."
The Prestige is based on the book of the same name by Christopher Priest and features Nolan's Batman star Christian Bale and X-Men's Hugh Jackman as the competing magicians, whose escalating conflict eventually leads to murder. Bale's Batman co-star Michael Caine also stars, as well as King Kong's Andy Serkis and The Island's Scarlett Johansson. Nolan said he was particularly excited about one of the smaller roles in the film. "There are a couple of historical figures in the film, including Nikola Tesla, the inventor," he said. "He's a fascinating character who features briefly in this movie, played by David Bowie."
Nolan has always been interested in the world of magic, even before reading the book. When the project was brought to him, he jumped at the chance to delve into a world that he felt hasn't been fully explored on film before. "I am a fan of magic, and I felt that I hadn't ever really seen a film address magic and what it takes to make magic and what it represents," he said. "And that's what the film tries to do. Really, there's magicians from the day in which, pre-television, pre-radio, a magician was a very large figure of that time. It's an interesting film with a lot going on."
Following The Prestige, Nolan expects to return to the world of Batman for another sequel film. Although he wouldn't say much about his plans, he did admit that the creative process is already underway. "[It's] not really anything that I'm prepared to talk about yet," he said. "[Co-writer David Goyer] and I have been working on what it's going to be. And as soon as this film is finished, we'll be figuring it out more specifically."
As for the rumors that the Joker or Harvey Dent, aka the villainous Two Face, will appear in the next Batman film, Nolan remained coy. "Anything's possible," he said. —Cindy White
http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire/index.ph ... 854&type=0
Posted: 02 Jun 2006, 17:07
by BiscLimpkit
Christopher Nolan can do no wrong imo.
Posted: 02 Jun 2006, 18:07
by gasteropod
I don't like Insomnia. The way he can't keep the camera still on one person's face makes me dizzy too.
Posted: 02 Jun 2006, 18:17
by BiscLimpkit
You sure you weren't drunk?

Posted: 02 Jun 2006, 18:36
by gasteropod
Haha, nah I've got the DVD and I tried to watch it again the other week but couldn't because of the way it felt like the director or editor had ADD. It's the same with Batman Begins in a fair few places, and I'm not just talking about the fight scenes. Shame, since Memento didn't seem to feature this problem.
Posted: 04 Jun 2006, 08:15
by ReconFive
Insomnia is a fantastic film and Christopher Nolan is a great director and writer.
I will admit that i am one of the few people who actually likes the type of photography you are talking about as long as its not completly overdone. If the technique is used appropriately it can add alot to certain types of dialog heavy scenes.
Posted: 17 Aug 2006, 12:01
by EvaUnit02
First teaser is up. Been up for about a month now.
http://www.movie-update.com/download/90 ... _h640w.mov
Right-click > Save link as.
EDIT: I watched the trailer, it looks great. Am looking forward to it now.
Posted: 17 Aug 2006, 12:31
by Kurgan
I saw the trailer for this quite early on (bookmark the Apple trailers page, people, they get 95% of the trailers first, and they tend to do them in glorious HD as well

).
It's strange that, again, there are two films coming out which have similar themes. There's this one, and one called
The Illusionist starring Ed Norton.
Posted: 17 Aug 2006, 12:38
by EvaUnit02
Kurgan wrote:I saw the trailer for this quite early on (bookmark the Apple trailers page, people, they 95% of the trailers first, and they tend to do them in glorious HD as well

).
Apple.com sucks, you don't get direct links to the trailers and A. streaming rubbish or B. having to dig through the page source to find the MOV link which may or may not be downloadable (a lot of the time they're just streamable only from my experience).
Posted: 17 Aug 2006, 12:46
by Kurgan
Apple's trailer page. Click on a given link which takes you to another page to view the trailer in your preference of size, HD or otherwise. Once its done, save the file using the little drop down menu.
What's so hard about that?
They have
never used streaming Quicktime for the trailers on that page; it's just not good enough to watch a film trailer in. Other pages like Yahoo! trailers have used streaming before, both Windows Media Player and Quicktime as well.
Beats having to search around for various films individually.
Posted: 17 Aug 2006, 13:25
by EvaUnit02
http://www.movie-update.com/ is much better, period. Just direct links.
Posted: 17 Aug 2006, 15:13
by Kurgan
Ooooooh
I'm quite interested in how this'll stack up against
The Illusionist. They both features magicians who seem to possess supernatural powers and both have pretty good looking leading ladies

It must've been one of those
Deep Impact/Armageddon scenarios where one studio gets the idea from another and rushes their own version into production.
Posted: 18 Aug 2006, 01:21
by bradavon
Thanks for the trailer Eva.
Nah Dave's Trailer page is by far the best.
Kurgan wrote:I saw the trailer for this quite early on (bookmark the Apple trailers page, people, they get 95% of the trailers first, and they tend to do them in glorious HD as well

).
I can barely play 720p let alone 1080p. I stick to 480p so no HD for me.
Posted: 18 Aug 2006, 19:34
by bradavon
This looks awesome!
Posted: 19 Aug 2006, 02:38
by EvaUnit02
Poster:-

Looks okay, I've seen far worse floating head montage posters in the past.
Source: AICN.
Posted: 19 Aug 2006, 02:57
by bradavon
That poster art is great. It's not up to French standards but few do movie art like the Frogs.
Posted: 24 Sep 2006, 18:51
by BiscLimpkit
The trailer is now showing in the cinema. I of course avoided it by shutting my eyes, placing my hands over my ears and singing "la la la". But from what I over my spoiler preventive method, it sounds awesome.
Posted: 12 Nov 2006, 18:49
by bradavon
The Prestige
7 out of 10
I saw this earlier and thought while it took a bit too long to get going (20 or so minutes could probably be exorcised) it was otherwise excellent.
There's two cracking twists. Funnily enough I got one (the Angier twist) but not the other (the Borden twist), but the person I was with got them round the other way. It's the sort of film you're left thinking about for ages afterwards, trying to work out where all the bits fit together.
You need to pay attention as there are lots of little clues sprinkled right throughout the film, which my friend and I enjoyed pointing out to each other afterwards.
Posted: 12 Nov 2006, 18:53
by romerojpg
I liked the film

stupidly I guessed the twists wayyy in advance of them being told one of them I guessed within the 1st half
The problem with the film is its bloody god damn depressing, one hell of a dark film with no real nice bits in it at all. Still good, if a little long as by ass went a bit knumb (from the seat ahem).
Posted: 12 Nov 2006, 18:55
by bradavon
Agreed it was a bit long, the first half parts were lost one me with all the plot strands going back and forth.
Posted: 12 Nov 2006, 19:18
by romerojpg
The Prestige – 3 out of 5
Good, solid film, but bloody depressing it has to be said and really while it was well made it kind of did signpost many of the twists. Still acting wise it was fun, and its dark tone is a little offbeat and new feeling, but hell it wasn’t a nice story and isn’t a likeable film full of nice people.
It could have been confusing mind you, but after a little time the timeframe got easy to catch onto, but I will say a lot of people WILL be confused as hell as to what’s going on. As long as you concentrate you should be fine.
It’s maybe too dark for its own good and by the end it was a tad to long-winded and could have been reduced a little. Still David Bowie was great fun, hamming it up no end and really most the cast did a fine job. Just don’t expect a film packed with laughs and hilarity, its wrist slittlingly moody and tortured in its own ways.
Posted: 12 Nov 2006, 20:26
by bradavon
romerojpg wrote:It could have been confusing mind you, but after a little time the timeframe got easy to catch onto, but I will say a lot of people WILL be confused as hell as to what’s going on. As long as you concentrate you should be fine.
Agreed
romerojpg wrote:Just don’t expect a film packed with laughs and hilarity, its wrist slittlingly moody and tortured in its own ways.
Huh? Does a film have to be all nice and gooey? Tortued WTF!!! It's just dark is all but considering all the director's work is dark I didn't expect anything else.
Posted: 13 Nov 2006, 17:22
by romerojpg
Ohh I didnt expect a fluffy film

its just the fact its a 12 rated film, there were a lot of kids in the showing I went to, you could see they were bored out of their skulls after the 1st 30 minutes. Its not a film for young people. I liked the tone as hey its not normal, but it is a little odder than your average film.
Posted: 13 Nov 2006, 18:24
by bradavon
The rating system isn't concerned with whether it's a film an age range will like, it's concerned with whether it's suitable.
The same applied to "Million Dollar Baby" being a 12A but not something kids would like.
I wouldn't say it's odd at all, there are many depressing or down-beat films out there.
Posted: 20 Nov 2006, 17:47
by BiscLimpkit
Prestige 4/5
A little predictable but excellent nevertheless. As with Fight Club, I have a feeling my opinion of this film will be even better upon a second viewing. Great character study into obsession and interesting 'science vs magic' underlying theme. A DVD purchase is inevitable.