Bullets 'n' Babes

Hey,

it's confirmed now. Maggie Q is attached to the latest Bruce Willis film.

Storyline sounds meh to be honest.

http://imdb.com/title/tt0337978/

HAHA, Len Wiseman.

Yeah, where's John McTiernan at?

Or even Renny Harlin?

No Sam Jackson? No characters from previous installments (bar Bruce)? No famous supporting actors?

Shite title!

I would've preferred the more simple DIE HARDEST.

What's wrong with that?

LIVE FREE sounds like patriotic pants.

Jackson wasn't in the frst two. Only Bruce's wife needs to return really and she isn't that important.

EvaUnit02 wrote:HAHA, Len Wiseman.

What the Fuck - Enough said this will be shit (or rather average).

This was originally titled Die Hard 4.0, this internet terrorist thing has always sounded retarded.

What wrong with 'Die Hard-On'?

Maggie Q I dont mind, but this is sounding seriously,erm,,,,,,YAWN....'

heres the trailer

http://youtube.com/watch?v=ztfShRH5YYw


looks decent enough

Lee Wiseman.

Who?

He's so famous Grim got his name wrong.

grim_tales wrote:Lee Wiseman.

Who?

Do you even know what the IMDB is god.

He is the director behind the Underworld and Underworld Evolution (probibly the best film this year). He gets to shag Kate Bekinsale as well, lucky bastardo.

romerojpg wrote:Underworld Evolution (probibly the best film this year).

Why don't I believe that?

Markgway wrote:

romerojpg wrote:Underworld Evolution (probibly the best film this year).

Why don't I believe that?

Because romerojpg said it!

Romero and Tom are the Mr. Muscle of movie watchers

grim_tales wrote:Romero and Tom are the Mr. Muscle of movie watchers

I'd add Bisc to that list.

Having seen the trailer, I don't think it will be anywhere near as bad as people are making out. You can't always tell by a trailer, but it shouldn't be a complete disaster that some are saying (due to the person on directorial duty). Underworld is a good movie.

Actually that trailer told me nothing. It looked horribly bland. I hope the full trailer offers a better omen. I have this nasty feeling that come July we'll all be sorry they made a fourth part.

Markgway wrote:

romerojpg wrote:Underworld Evolution (probibly the best film this year).

Why don't I believe that?

I take it you have not even seen it then. See it, then come back.

I don't think there's much point watching a sequel to something I don't think I'll like.

Maybe when it's on TV... or if I had the disc sitting in front of me... or if I was at someone's house and they tied me to a chair and threatened physical violence to my genitals.... just maybe...?

romerojpg wrote:I take it you have not even seen it then. See it, then come back.

I have and while I enjoyed it (Part 1 is better) it's sorry little ass is kicked to the moon and back by the masterpiece that is Pan's Labyrinth.

Good film but FAR from the best of the year. Casino Royale is far better too.

brooce-leroy wrote:Having seen the trailer, I don't think it will be anywhere near as bad as people are making out. You can't always tell by a trailer, but it shouldn't be a complete disaster that some are saying (due to the person on directorial duty). Underworld is a good movie.

Going by Underworld and Underworld 2 I'm sure too it won't be a disaster but lets be honest it has a HELL OF A LOT to live up too.

Die Hard and Die Hard 3 are top class action films, Die Hard 2 was also good but too samey against Part 1.

bradavon wrote: Good film but FAR from the best of the year. Casino Royale is far better too.

It wouldn't be in the running for FOTY 2006 anyway, seeing as it's coming out in 2007.

Huh? Brad was referring to Pan's Labyrinth.

Good they showed Maggie Q in this early trailer.

From the director of the UNDERWORLD movies!!!!

Dont hold much hope for this then...HOWEVER, I think it would be pretty hard to mess up a Die Hard film with Bruce in it...

is the bad guy gonna be another Gruber brother?

Fritz Gruber?

Markgway wrote:Fritz Gruber?