Two poor children were tortured/beaten by two other children 
The victims should never have to relive what happened to them. I didn't know that was why the 2 boys were charged with the "lesser" crime.
kill them I say, so what if they are kids, and kill the parents as well as reading about them makes me sick.
way to go UK 
keep up the Justice 
Yeah okay Mark over exaggerate why don't youMarkgway wrote:It's the society we live in. We tolerate violence. We don't punish the guilty. Is anyone truly surprised shit like this happens?
barley 8 yearsbradavon wrote:How long did the kids who killed Jamie Bulger get?
staggering really. The facts of the case were worse than ever reported as well, like the fact they tried to kill another boy a few hours earlier, lovely kids. 8 Hours!!bradavon wrote:I'm not saying 8Hrs is enough
If you think I'm exaggerating your shallow head is in the clouds. The guilty are not properly punished. They don't even jail most people they catch carrying knives. I've seen adult murderers get only a few years for brutal killings. Remember the guy that was murdered in a supermarket by a complete stranmger. Four years wasn't it? A life sentence does not mean life. It's a bogus misnomer designed to fool the public into thinking the courts are being tough. Life is cheap in the UK and it's getting cheaper. Those two little shitbags just convicted were known to the Police and you know what they did? Fuck all - as usual.bradavon wrote:Yeah okay Mark over exaggerate why don't you
It's bleeding hearts like you Brad that make this country so fucking intolerable. You make excuses for bastards whilst innocents suffer. Would you be so lenient if it had been your little boy who was bludgeoned to death?bradavon wrote:I'm not saying 8Hrs is enough but you do have to take into account the age of the person and at the age these kids are/were it would be wrong to treat them exactly the same as adults, even if obviously they should know it's clearly wrong.
Likewise it's "my way or the highway, lets lock everyone who steals a loaf of bread up for life" point of view that IMO that gives this country such a bad name.It's bleeding hearts like you Brad that make this country so fucking intolerable.
I'm so not. If you read what I said, instead of assuming something, you'd see all I said was you need to take into account the persons age and that you, as usual, are exaggerating, to make your point stronger.You make excuses for bastards whilst innocents suffer.
Show me where I'm being lenient?Would you be so lenient if it had been your little boy who was bludgeoned to death?
British society. Do you live in a bubble?bradavon wrote:We tolerate violence - Who tolerates violence?
I have never seen a sentence given that exceeds what it should be. Mostly the sentences are far too lenient. No wonder most convicts smirk at the cameras as they leave court. They know they'll be out in a few years to do it again. Lives are ruined by these scum and they are not punished anywhere near hard enough. There's always a queue of liberals to make excuses for them.We don't punish the guilty - Of course we do, no one said it was perfect. There are just as many cases where someone has been given a long sentence, you're just choosing to ignore that.
I wouldn't jail anyone who steals food because they need to. The vast majority don't need to commit crime so your comparison is spurious. I'm largely talking about violent criminals. How would you feel if someone glassed you in a pub causing you to lose an eye and got a six months in jail? It's happened. The list is endless.Likewise it's "my way or the highway, lets lock everyone who steals a loaf of bread up for life" point of view that IMO that gives this country such a bad name.
And citing the person's age is not an excuse? A ten year old does know the difference between right and murder. Not like we're talking about complex issues of sexuality here. Those little shits knew what they were doing and should still be behind bars.I'm so not. If you read what I said, instead of assuming something, you'd see all I said was you need to take into account the persons age and that you, as usual, are exaggerating, to make your point stronger.
"I'm not saying 8Hrs is enough but you do have to take into account the age of the person and at the age these kids are/were it would be wrong to treat them exactly the same as adults, even if obviously they should know it's clearly wrong."Show me where I'm being lenient?
This isn't about the law in principle it's about injustices in sentencing.You've regularly said "the law is the law" but it seems this only applies when it suits you.
No-lock the fuckers up for life with no parole.Those twats who hilled Jamie Bulger should've been left to rot.grim_tales wrote:You would think so Mark, when I was 10 I certainly knew that killing/crime/murder was very wrong. But when do we say the buck stops - it could be someway to do with the parents but there must be a point it stops. What they did was pure evil. Should the parents be prosecuted?
grim_tales wrote:The "8Hrs" was a clear typo.
