Mainly by improving the editing. The HK version (also the action scenes) lack any flow and often go on forever. For example in the opening action scene in the mountains Jackie falls about 700 times on his way down...gasteropod wrote:How does it do that? I always wanted to see the HK cut but since there was never a decent release I gave up.HungFist wrote:Miramax's Mickey Mouse cut is actually superior to the Hong Kong version for at least improving the technical quality a bit.
You can see Miramax agreed - they didn't just remove certain scenes to make the running time shorter, but they made several hundred edits (many of them just one or two seconds) because the entire film was in a need of re-editing to make it look less amateurish.
I had the R2J with both cuts (the long version is non-anamorphic), but sold it. Hard core Jackie fans will say the HK version is better simply for being longer and original, but it's really quite a poor film and the HK version only enhances the issues...
I'm not defending Miramax's decision to custom cut the film, I'm just saying don't except the original version to be a better film, because in fact it's worse.
edit: http://www.movie-censorship.com/report.php?ID=1809



