Yi-Long wrote:Ow yeah, and that's ok cause these are guys and there's no such thing as guys not wanting sex or guys that don't like to be touched by other women etc... (!)
It was an OBVIOUS joke and you know it. Can't believe you chose to offer such a serious relpy. You think I meant it? No one should be forced into any kind of sexual activity.
Well... I guess for very religious people it could be offensive. Personally, I'm not religious, but I guess you can compare it with people photoshopping your mom's face on a picture of a girl giving head to a donkey or something.
I didn't say it wasn't offensive. Although the "Mom-Donkey" thing sounds worse because it's personal. But I'd rather that than get my head kicked in. In your previous post you made it sound like wrapping a book in a flag is worse than the physical abuse.
Actually, if you had watched a couple of documentaries (dont know if they were shown in England, because you have Blair and all supporting this shite), but there have already been numerous documentaries reporting that many of these detainees were pretty much picked up 'at random' because so and so said they were taliban.
I meant of the detainees at Guantanomo Bay, not every Muslim who was arrested. Of course some of those guys were just being questioned. Hopefully.
You also saw a guy returning home from QB, bringing the reporters to his house, trying to get backhis shop, and showing the reporters his secret stash of USA moveis, like titanic: turned out he really liked american culture and movies etc, and was in fact hiding it from the taliban... guess they took the wrong guy, huh!?
Yeah, but was he beaten and abused? Or just interogated? If they let the guy go it doesn't sound like he was unfairly treated. Wrong place wrong time. But I'm skeptical that even the U.S would risk International incident by purposely throwing random Muslims into Guantanomo.
Well... after sex I usually get a bit hungry... so... you know...
Eating pet Rabbitt! Shame on you!! Everyone lock up your kittens!!!
Actually, it's a case of trying to cover up their nazi-like policy on how to treat terrorisme suspects, by scape-goating a couple of soldiers who were only following orders (they still deserve punishment ofcourse). Have any of the commanding officers stood trial? No! This isnt a case of random idiots taking potshots at prisoners:It's standard procedure. This has already been noticed and noted and reported by many different human rights groups and ex-prisoners and lawyers and many many more... This is how the yankees treat arab/islamic prisoners when they suspect them of terrorisme...
Those are fair points. To blame only selected soldiers (ie. ones dumb enough to be caught in the photos) smacks of scapegoating. We need to brings the upper command to justice and ensure that these tactics become a thing of the past.
I don't really know why you would start a discussion about this subject, when it's clear you havent really donemuch research on the matter, just a prejudiced opinion.
Yi-Long, there is no one more prejudiced than you. As far back as I can remember you have been hating the "Yankees" with left-wing aplomb. But, hey, that's OK then isn't it? As soon as anyone questions this they become racist, prejudiced or ignorant. Nice.
It would go nicely with the prostituting and free drugs policy etc...
Free drugs???
As long as they make money of it, drugs and selling ur body to married men are OK I guess... (but that's a whole other discssion...)
You could start one. I never get tired of your facist rants.
I don't want to watch people being scared and hurt in the name of entertainment. 
Also what happens if a person gets the death penalty but then new evidence shows that they are innocent? Nothing will bring them back.
