Teacher found guilty of endangering kids due to Spyware

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 17 Jan 2007, 17:36

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/01/13/0753209

Also: Fighting Porn Vs. Ruining Innocent Lives: http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/01/15/2355233

Only in the bible belt of America. Religious fanaticism doesn't just come from the middle east.

grim_tales · Post by **grim_tales** » 17 Jan 2007, 20:02

That is absolutely ludicrous. The teacher had told others about the spyware but no one had helped her

Which begs the question why couldnt they just get a new licence if they were that worried? Though I cant see why a kid looking at porn (accidentally) counts as risk of injury

The next tale is even sadder

It wasnt the guy's fault at all, I mean it wasn't as if he was jerking off to the images. As he was forced to use his university computer, it was news to him, and everyone else, he found "child pornogrpahy" on it. Inadequate services were given to him.

Poor guy. Only in America. Only the religious right.

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 18 Jan 2007, 22:54

Not to mention he now has a criminal record for passing Playboy around.

My god if you've actually looked at Playboy it has more articles than porn and is really no worse than FHM, which shows topless shots now. The only difference is the women is naked BUT it's very tasteful.

grim_tales · Post by **grim_tales** » 19 Jan 2007, 10:13

Playboy isn't sold over here is it?

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 19 Jan 2007, 16:32

grim_tales wrote:Playboy isn't sold over here is it?

Sure it is.

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 20 Jan 2007, 12:49

grim_tales wrote:Playboy isn't sold over here is it?

It's adult material like the rest of it but I the real irony and I do find this really weird kind of unique to America that in the same country porn can be so reviled but at the same time it can be so much a multi-million dollar business.

It just depends what state you're in, that's completely absurd.

I also find it weird that most Americans seem to think of Play as NOT porn whereas we do here. Playboy is America's FHM, which to some extent is a porn mag too. It didn't use to be but since they decided to show topless shots (since the others did) they are now.

You even here women saying their Grandma would be proud I was in Playboy. Not over here love and why? It's a porn mag. I bet they wouldn't be proud if you were in any other Porn mag (like Penthouse).

It's almost as if "it can't be Porn because Hugh is a nice guy" is the mentality.

There is very little different between Playboy and FHM really. It's just Playboy goes that one step further.

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 20 Jan 2007, 14:36

It's ironic that W.H. Smith refuse to stock the rather tasteful and intelligent Playboy on the grounds that it's "porn" yet will happily sell trashy tit-packed lads mags to anyone who walks in.

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 20 Jan 2007, 14:47

I know. Weird or what. Like you say Playboy is more intelligent then most lads mags.

WH Smiths should get real and sell porn.