I have the HD-DVD. I did a comparison by running the DVD and HD on the same TV at the same time and switching back and forth and the difference in quality is amazing. The HD is by far one of the best transfers I've ever seen for a film.
But yeah there is no difference between the transfers. Atleast that's what I see.
King Kong (2005): 2-Disc SE vs. 3-Disc EE
-
BiscLimpkit
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 4727
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 22:33
- Location: Scotland
bradavon wrote:I didn't say Tom's opinion was wrong what gave you that idea? I did say my opinion to me is more important. I think that's to clever for you to understand though.Shingster wrote:Tom has given you direct calculative evidence that your "percieved" difference in colour tone is wrong. Not wrong in his opinion, it is wrong full stop. :bootyshake:
You totally misunderstood what Shingster's trying to say. Basically you saying that the two transfers are different in terms of colour.... is like saying 2+2=3.
It's not a matter of opinion. Tom has just given evidence that the transfers are the same, colour wise.
-
romerojpg
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 8520
- Joined: 26 Oct 2004, 14:12
- Location: CLOSE TO YOUR MAMMA
You must love the film to buy them allcaptainjoe wrote:I have the HD-DVD. I did a comparison by running the DVD and HD on the same TV at the same time and switching back and forth and the difference in quality is amazing. The HD is by far one of the best transfers I've ever seen for a film.
But yeah there is no difference between the transfers. Atleast that's what I see.
I cannot wait to go HD, but notr for a while, but Kong will be one to get, when they get around to releasing the extended cut with extras mind you. I have seen a few compaisons between DVD and HD and they were stunning the differences, the detail on Kongs face was mind blowowing!-
grim_tales
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 22161
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
- Location: St. Albans, UK
