Likely cuts made to The Dark Knight DVD.

Non-Asian Film & Release Discussion, and Serious Film-Related Discussion
User avatar
IronMonkey
Royal Tramp
Posts: 1950
Joined: 08 Dec 2004, 16:49

Post by IronMonkey »

Grim, I've no idea about the DVD, I don't own it. But I would imagine it won't be any different, why would they could the "why so serious" line?

You're just getting yourself confused again...
saltysam wrote:someone elsewhere said the scene in question was in the trailer but not in the finished cinema version anyway.
To be honest, I can't really remember it being any different in the cinema to what I watched last night on BD.
TH-42PX80 | DMP-BD50 (MR BD & DVD) | SA-XR55 | SB-TP20 | XBox 360 Slim 250GB | XBox (XBMC, 160GB) | Zotac XBMC HTPC | Gaming PC | 8TB Media Server
User avatar
Markgway
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 20193
Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04

Post by Markgway »

All I remember is that in the cinema version you know that The Joker has placed his knife in the gangster's mouth, which he press against the inside gums... then it cuts to a from behind shot and The Joker's arm moves as the scene cuts. It's clear that he's cut thru his cheek even though you don't see any detail. I haven't yet seen any home release. It's probable that all BDs and DVDs were mastered from the PG-13 print which in theory could have been snipped. Remember a matter fo frames were removed from the likes of M:I2, Charlie's Angels and A History of Violence. Whereas the UK cinema versions of all three were uncut.
Image
User avatar
grim_tales
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 22161
Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
Location: St. Albans, UK

Post by grim_tales »

What happened to the other posts in this thread? :?
User avatar
bradavon
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 24430
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30

Post by bradavon »

User avatar
grim_tales
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 22161
Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
Location: St. Albans, UK

Post by grim_tales »

Thanks Brad :)
User avatar
Markgway
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 20193
Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04

Post by Markgway »

:lol:
Image
User avatar
grim_tales
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 22161
Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
Location: St. Albans, UK

Post by grim_tales »

What's so funny?
User avatar
IronMonkey
Royal Tramp
Posts: 1950
Joined: 08 Dec 2004, 16:49

Post by IronMonkey »

Why so serious?
TH-42PX80 | DMP-BD50 (MR BD & DVD) | SA-XR55 | SB-TP20 | XBox 360 Slim 250GB | XBox (XBMC, 160GB) | Zotac XBMC HTPC | Gaming PC | 8TB Media Server
User avatar
grim_tales
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 22161
Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
Location: St. Albans, UK

Post by grim_tales »

Ho ho good one :D
User avatar
Markgway
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 20193
Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04

Post by Markgway »

Appears to be that ALL home versions are cut because the print used is the PG-13 version which was slightly censored in the face-cutting scene. Looks like the UK cinema print was (possibly) uncut. Same thing happened with M:I2 and Charlie's Angels. Chances of seeing an uncut version on DVD or BD are very slim.
Image
User avatar
bradavon
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 24430
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30

Post by bradavon »

Is that definitely confirmed?

It's not surprising when so many BDs (which I bet affected the DVD too, although it shouldn't have) are authored for America first, then the rest of the world.

We got the USA Fearless BD.
User avatar
Markgway
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 20193
Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04

Post by Markgway »

I can't say definately as I haven't seen them myself but it appears to be the case.

If I hear anything more or contrary I'll post.
Image
jimmyscab
Pedicab Driver
Posts: 227
Joined: 13 Mar 2005, 14:22

Post by jimmyscab »

I may have to download CAM bootleg just to confirm!
User avatar
Shingster
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 4140
Joined: 08 Sep 2006, 11:14

Post by Shingster »

jimmyscab wrote:I may have to download CAM bootleg just to confirm!
You know, i'm shocked people haven't done this already and provided a definitive opinion. There is the impending IMAX re-release of course.
User avatar
bradavon
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 24430
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30

Post by bradavon »

IMAX re-release, where?
saltysam
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 9357
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 19:27

Post by saltysam »

bradavon wrote:IMAX re-release, where?
i heard it was going to be in an IMAX cinema :wink:
User avatar
bradavon
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 24430
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30

Post by bradavon »

It already has been, unless you mean it's being re-released, got it.
Yi-Long
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 8616
Joined: 26 Oct 2004, 13:46
Location: Alkmaar, Holland

Post by Yi-Long »

That's a shame about it being cut. Now I'll have to download it untill they release an uncut version.
Image
I was there, the big BNB blackout of november, 2008. We lost many that day...
User avatar
Shingster
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 4140
Joined: 08 Sep 2006, 11:14

Post by Shingster »

OK, I decided to "acquire" a camcorder boot of Dark Knight to get to the bottom of this. Asfar as I can tell, this is what people are saying is what originally happened in theatres:
"In the cinema version heath ledger puts the Stanley knife in the hoodlum's mouth and from a reverse shot the viewer sees the joker thrust his hand. The reverse shot was quite effective because you only saw heath moving his arm then the reaction of the other hoodlum as the body fell to the floor. "
This clearly doesn't happen in the boot I checked (which was a cinema rip as you can hear the audience at the start). What happens is Joker delivers his speech with the knife in his victim's mouth, then he says "Why so serious" and we cut instantly to the guy's friend who is being restrained, we get an audio cue from the score that suggests the Joker has slashed his victim's mouth while we watch his friend flinching heavily (actually thrusting forward), then it cuts to the Joker letting go of his victim, and his limp body falling to the floor.

There is no thrusting motion, it's actually the flinching of the victim's friend and the score that suggestion any motion/slashing at all. This is a common and effective trick filmmakers use when they want to imply a violent act without actually showing it.
User avatar
Markgway
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 20193
Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04

Post by Markgway »

Was it a UK-based camcorder boot?

If it was American then it would be the same (cut?) PG-13 version.
Image
User avatar
Shingster
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 4140
Joined: 08 Sep 2006, 11:14

Post by Shingster »

Ah, well that I couldn't say, but I bet it's almost certainly a US job. Are people saying the US always had an edited down version now? That sounds extremely unlikely given a US PG-13 film will always have more leniency on the violence than a UK 12A (which is our PG-13).

I don't remember there being reports of the US edit being cut down when the film was initially released in cinemas, but then again I don't really pay attention most of the time!
User avatar
bradavon
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 24430
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30

Post by bradavon »

:D
User avatar
Markgway
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 20193
Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04

Post by Markgway »

Shingster wrote:Are people saying the US always had an edited down version now?
Yes. It's been suggested that the cut was made for a PG-13 rating.
That sounds extremely unlikely given a US PG-13 film will always have more leniency on the violence than a UK 12A (which is our PG-13).
That used to be the case... not so much now. The UK version of Casino Royale had more violence than in America for example. Terminator 3 was a 12A here and an 'R' in the US. The BBFC are way more lenient (probably too lenient) than they were.
I don't remember there being reports of the US edit being cut down when the film was initially released in cinemas, but then again I don't really pay attention most of the time!
Maybe not the sort of thing you'd notice until you have it in your home on rewind.
Image
jimmyscab
Pedicab Driver
Posts: 227
Joined: 13 Mar 2005, 14:22

Post by jimmyscab »

Damn so the quest goes on!

Thanks for looking into it though Shingster.
User avatar
bradavon
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 24430
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30

Post by bradavon »

Markgway wrote:The BBFC are way more lenient (probably too lenient) than they were.
I thought you were against all forms of cuts?

I'd say they mostly get it right nowadays.
Post Reply