The Last King of Scotland
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
The Last King of Scotland
I'm surprised we've not got a thread for this one.
I saw it earlier tonight and it's excellent.
Forest Whitaker is a real powerhouse and larger than life, he's a real marvel. He not only looks like Idi Amin but IS Idi Amin. I heard reports Ugandan's thought he was Idi Amin I'm not surprised.
I hope he at least gets nominated for an Oscar. The Scottish doctor played by James McAvoy is very good too (actually the lead), so is Gillian Anderson in a smaller role.
A lot of it is shot in a documentary style with cameras not "quite" in focus, it works really well.
The Last King of Scotland is not a violent film and for the majority of it's running time the violence is spoken of but not seen. There are two graphic scenes however one of which I personally thought was gratuitous and came as a shock to me.
If I have one complain I thought it could've been a wee bit shorter, not much just some tighter editing.
One guy left just before the credits were rolling when the film was still going on and one women sat through the majority of the film and then left about 20 minutes before it was over. I guess she couldn't stomach the (brief) violence, fair enough but to spend all that time and then leave. I've never understood why people leave after spending so much time on a film.
Oh and there are a few hot African ladies too.
A solid 8 out of 10.
I saw it earlier tonight and it's excellent.
Forest Whitaker is a real powerhouse and larger than life, he's a real marvel. He not only looks like Idi Amin but IS Idi Amin. I heard reports Ugandan's thought he was Idi Amin I'm not surprised.
I hope he at least gets nominated for an Oscar. The Scottish doctor played by James McAvoy is very good too (actually the lead), so is Gillian Anderson in a smaller role.
A lot of it is shot in a documentary style with cameras not "quite" in focus, it works really well.
The Last King of Scotland is not a violent film and for the majority of it's running time the violence is spoken of but not seen. There are two graphic scenes however one of which I personally thought was gratuitous and came as a shock to me.
If I have one complain I thought it could've been a wee bit shorter, not much just some tighter editing.
One guy left just before the credits were rolling when the film was still going on and one women sat through the majority of the film and then left about 20 minutes before it was over. I guess she couldn't stomach the (brief) violence, fair enough but to spend all that time and then leave. I've never understood why people leave after spending so much time on a film.
Oh and there are a few hot African ladies too.
A solid 8 out of 10.
Last edited by bradavon on 14 Jan 2007, 21:04, edited 4 times in total.
- BiscLimpkit
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 4727
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 22:33
- Location: Scotland
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
- grim_tales
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 22162
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
- Location: St. Albans, UK
-
romerojpg
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 8520
- Joined: 26 Oct 2004, 14:12
- Location: CLOSE TO YOUR MAMMA
Yup.
His skin colour seems to be darkened somehow, either make up or digital colour correction I would guess
Forrest isnt that dark skinned normally, and yes from what I saw his face does some funky things, quite disturbing looking mental face
but he has always been able to do things like that, quite an actor really and its amazing to think he has been around for so long now.
He said in a recent interview that "Van Damme isnt hard at all and would get his arse kicked in a street fight"
as Forrest is apprently a long time martial artist so they should have gave him a fighting role in Bloodsport then 
His skin colour seems to be darkened somehow, either make up or digital colour correction I would guess
He said in a recent interview that "Van Damme isnt hard at all and would get his arse kicked in a street fight"
-
romerojpg
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 8520
- Joined: 26 Oct 2004, 14:12
- Location: CLOSE TO YOUR MAMMA
Its not CG, its colour correction, and most films do it now and it can totally change what a person or part of a person looks like (or a complete scene). You would be suprised what they change in some films for no reason other than they can, it costs cash and they are ignorant and flash it about I guess. It doesnt look that hard to do either in the documentaires I have seen about itbradavon wrote:If they have it would be make up, much cheaper than putting CG on to every frame.
But hey I would guess it is make up, but you never can ytell sometimes as studios are thick as pigshit when it comes to their cash.
- BiscLimpkit
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 4727
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 22:33
- Location: Scotland
- BiscLimpkit
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 4727
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 22:33
- Location: Scotland
