Profile 2.0 Compatible Blu-Ray Players
-
bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
Profile 2.0 Compatible Blu-Ray Players
I thought it would be useful to compile a list of Profile 2.0 Compatible BD Players. Here goes:
1. Sony Playstation 3 - Out Now (Firmware upgraded required)
2. Panasonic DMP-BD50 - Out around May time, the DMP-BD30 is Profile 1.1: http://www.homecinemachoice.com/cgi-bin ... hp?id=9476
UPDATE: 08/06/08: Panasonic DMP-BD50 review: http://reviews.cnet.com/video-players-a ... 15617.html
3. Sony BDP-S350 (Summer 2008) and BDP-S550 (Autumn 2008) have just been announced: http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/26/sony ... ayers-sin/
UPDATE: All three Sony models are DTS-HD Master Audio compatible too.
4. LG BD300 (Autumn 2008): http://blog.homecinemachoice.com/page/h ... _bd_player
1. Sony Playstation 3 - Out Now (Firmware upgraded required)
2. Panasonic DMP-BD50 - Out around May time, the DMP-BD30 is Profile 1.1: http://www.homecinemachoice.com/cgi-bin ... hp?id=9476
UPDATE: 08/06/08: Panasonic DMP-BD50 review: http://reviews.cnet.com/video-players-a ... 15617.html
3. Sony BDP-S350 (Summer 2008) and BDP-S550 (Autumn 2008) have just been announced: http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/26/sony ... ayers-sin/
UPDATE: All three Sony models are DTS-HD Master Audio compatible too.
4. LG BD300 (Autumn 2008): http://blog.homecinemachoice.com/page/h ... _bd_player
Last edited by bradavon on 03 Aug 2008, 13:56, edited 5 times in total.
-
gasteropod
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 6868
- Joined: 03 Nov 2004, 18:16
-
bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
Personally I reckon it was deliberate. They can make their money back on PS3 Games and knew their trump card always was the PS3 so did everything to make it stand out from the crowd.
I doubt they had much interest in their standalones, knowing they have a limited market at their initial price point. Now that BD has won they can start reducing prices and pushing them more.
I doubt they had much interest in their standalones, knowing they have a limited market at their initial price point. Now that BD has won they can start reducing prices and pushing them more.
-
gasteropod
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 6868
- Joined: 03 Nov 2004, 18:16
Yeah but it's not like they advertise and make a big deal out of the PS3 having the latest BD profile is it, most people don't even know anything about the profiles. So for the people that do know, and are bothered, Sony could have potentially got them to buy a newer standalone by not updating the PS3's BD profile.
-
bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
I'd imagine that's why they don't. It would confuse the hell out of most people, especially if it made them realise that BD wasn't complete at launch. Imagine if the public knew what this means.
I think the likelihood of that happening is low. They're very expensive. People are prepared to pay mega bucks for the new all singing, all dancing Console but they won't for a glorified DVD Player (in most people's minds).Sony could have potentially got them to buy a newer standalone by not updating the PS3's BD profile.
-
saltysam
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 9357
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 19:27
i hear this new Region B profile 1.1 panasonic is multi-region for dvds out of the box
http://shop.panasonic.co.uk/invt/dmpbd30egk
£300 here with 2 free discs...may interest Mark?
http://www.avland.co.uk/panasonic/dmpbd30/dmp-bd30.htm
http://shop.panasonic.co.uk/invt/dmpbd30egk
£300 here with 2 free discs...may interest Mark?
http://www.avland.co.uk/panasonic/dmpbd30/dmp-bd30.htm
-
bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
It's a fair price for a Profile 1.1 Player, Profile 1.1 players are dead rare in Europe outside of the PS3.
It's also a decent make. Samsung sell models for much less but we all know how great their BD Players have been. Personally I wouldn't buy a £200 Player as it will only be inferior or likely have problems not found on a more expensive one.
I consider them investments that I want to last me years.
It's also a decent make. Samsung sell models for much less but we all know how great their BD Players have been. Personally I wouldn't buy a £200 Player as it will only be inferior or likely have problems not found on a more expensive one.
I consider them investments that I want to last me years.
-
bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
The Panasonic DMP-BD30 gets 9 out of 10 in this UK review:
http://www.trustedreviews.com/home-cine ... -Player/p1
It was only released a few weeks ago in the UK:
http://crave.cnet.co.uk/dvdpvr/0,390307 ... 767,00.htm
Crikey I wasn't expecting this, hopefully the DMP-BD50 is the same:
It's £350 are Amazon. £299.99 the best I can find it for.
It's going to be another year before we see Profile 2.0 Players at a sub £280-300 price. They're only finally coming out (except for the PS3) this May and then only Panasonic + Sony have any scheduled. All Samsung's are still Profile 1.0.
I guess you have to ask yourself if you want a BD Player now (or May if you want Profile 2.0) or wait another year? 2009 is going to be the big year for HD, maybe Xmas 2008.
http://www.trustedreviews.com/home-cine ... -Player/p1
It was only released a few weeks ago in the UK:
http://crave.cnet.co.uk/dvdpvr/0,390307 ... 767,00.htm
Crikey I wasn't expecting this, hopefully the DMP-BD50 is the same:
DivX + Profile 1.1 + SD DVD MR + Panasonic build quality for £299.99 is an excellent price!There's also another feature on the BD30 that we welcome with open arms. It can play DivX -- implying XviD support as well -- which is an excellent addition to an HD player, because until now there's been pretty much no support for downloaded formats in next-generation players.
It's £350 are Amazon. £299.99 the best I can find it for.
It's going to be another year before we see Profile 2.0 Players at a sub £280-300 price. They're only finally coming out (except for the PS3) this May and then only Panasonic + Sony have any scheduled. All Samsung's are still Profile 1.0.
I guess you have to ask yourself if you want a BD Player now (or May if you want Profile 2.0) or wait another year? 2009 is going to be the big year for HD, maybe Xmas 2008.
-
bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
Next you guys will tell me the PS3 makes you tea and will give you sexual gratification too.
The PS3 doesn't count, why because I said so!
Seriously it's a Games Console so is kind of a different category to a BD Standalone, even if yes I know it can do much the same stuff. You know what I mean, please no come back Salty
The PS3 doesn't count, why because I said so!
Seriously it's a Games Console so is kind of a different category to a BD Standalone, even if yes I know it can do much the same stuff. You know what I mean, please no come back Salty
-
EvaUnit02
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 9149
- Joined: 08 Feb 2005, 14:39
- Location: Wellywood, Kiwiland
- Contact:
-
bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
I know, I know.
I just meant they're a different category again so IMO cannot be compared. Put it this way: those who buy a Games Console are not the same market as those who buy a Dedicated Separates player. A HC enthusiast may want both but they're different markets.
And it's rare to see DivX on HD Separates, so it's worth celebrating, for me anyway
I just meant they're a different category again so IMO cannot be compared. Put it this way: those who buy a Games Console are not the same market as those who buy a Dedicated Separates player. A HC enthusiast may want both but they're different markets.
And it's rare to see DivX on HD Separates, so it's worth celebrating, for me anyway
-
gasteropod
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 6868
- Joined: 03 Nov 2004, 18:16
I too hated the PS2 as a DVD player - it went out of synch with the sound after the layer change! I remember the Xbox having great picture quality.EvaUnit02 wrote:(Eg PS2 was the worst DVD player that I've ever used. Skipping entire chapters after layer change, no joke. Xbox 1 on the other hand is one of the best.)
Brad - you're a damned fool for thinking the PS3 doesn't count. It doesn't even look 'chunky' if you have it on its side, it looks ace. I'd never have it flat.
-
EvaUnit02
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 9149
- Joined: 08 Feb 2005, 14:39
- Location: Wellywood, Kiwiland
- Contact:
-
gasteropod
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 6868
- Joined: 03 Nov 2004, 18:16
-
bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
-
gasteropod
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 6868
- Joined: 03 Nov 2004, 18:16
-
gasteropod
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 6868
- Joined: 03 Nov 2004, 18:16
-
bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
-
bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
Can anyone explain this? -
I've just noticed in the first post of this thread, the news on the two upcoming Sony Profile 2.0 Players says:
"Sony's got two new ones for you today, the BDP-S350 and BDP-S550. Both feature BD-Live (and thus Ethernet) and USB (for external) storage, while the S550 has PiP (BonusView) and 1GB of onboard storage."
Huh? So the BDP-S350 is Profile 2.0 compatible (BD Live) but not Profile 1.1 (PiP - BonusView).
That cannot be right, both must support PIP but the BDP-S550 just has more storage space, meaning you'll need to clear out the BDP-S350's memory more often. The BDP-S350 doesn't seem to support DTS-HD MA (unlike the BDP-S550) so I wouldn't want it anyway.
I've just noticed in the first post of this thread, the news on the two upcoming Sony Profile 2.0 Players says:
"Sony's got two new ones for you today, the BDP-S350 and BDP-S550. Both feature BD-Live (and thus Ethernet) and USB (for external) storage, while the S550 has PiP (BonusView) and 1GB of onboard storage."
Huh? So the BDP-S350 is Profile 2.0 compatible (BD Live) but not Profile 1.1 (PiP - BonusView).
That cannot be right, both must support PIP but the BDP-S550 just has more storage space, meaning you'll need to clear out the BDP-S350's memory more often. The BDP-S350 doesn't seem to support DTS-HD MA (unlike the BDP-S550) so I wouldn't want it anyway.
